Career Specialty Forums >> Design Bistro >> The Differences between “Art” and “Design”
The Differences between “Art” and “Design”
|
9 posts back to top |
Posted about 1 year ago
While I was in school there was a unique awareness between the design department and the art department. We occupied the same building, took similar classes, hung out at the same bars and would use the same prissily language during critiques. The question I always used to ask my counterparts is “what’s the difference between design and art?”, or “designers and artists” for that matter. Some would swear there was no distinction; others would laugh at the idea of an “artist” in a “design” studio. What do you think bistro “designers”? Let this “artist” know.
|
|
1430 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Designer and Artist here... depends on which part of me is dominant at any given moment which I am, but this is just me and how I define the difference for my work. BTW all artists worth spit are designers and all designers worth spit are artists... but that's obviously, just my opinion. Good art is designed. Good design is art. Design is art created with a specific purpose, a designated use(see the word design in there?). Design can feed our intellect and our senses, or wallets, occationally our hearts. "Art" is created to express and evoke emotion or communication but without any other clear intent... it would muddy the water, remove it's "purity" or artfulness. Art feeds souls, hearts and the occassional wallet if the artist is good enough or lucky enough. Each day is a gift, open it up and play with it! |
|
352 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago For me there is no difference. That's like saying you can have positive space without negative space...no can do. A true artist is like a gnat fly...these are the ones you will remember...all the sweet ones melt away like butter... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
9 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Janice says ...
Wouldn't you say art has a very designated use? have you ever looked at a work of art and thought, "i wonder what that's for?" |
|
1011 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago danieldavid says ...
You are right David, people may say that about art, but I believe (like Janice I am both) the art was created by the artist not for the end purpose but as an expression or evocation of emotions. For me being an artist, now after 20+ years as a designer, is freeing. I don't think about the what it's for, who is going to use or need it. If it sells great but not my "why" for creating anymore. But, design surely is still in me in everything I do somewhere buried deep within my soul. |
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Design is to plan or make something in a skillful or artistic way. It is the intention or purpose of the art work...in whatever medium or form it is presented. The created art itself is open to its viewers individual interpretation. That is the beauty of art my art friends! |
|
3 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago I believe it's all about your enviroment, artist work with the mood or setting of their work. while designers plan out a structure and visually try to make things work. |
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago I was raised in an art studio, my dad was both a fine artist and a designer...both disciplines segue into each other...I know, various people say you cannot be proficient in both, but maybe that's more about them, than about those of us who can balance their mediums. check out: laurelhuggins.blogspot.com |
|
38 posts back to top |
| Posted 12 months ago I would have to say there are similarities and differences in the both. Design to me is something that was captured out of the mind. Something that never existed before and you create it or you design it to make it so. But Art, is more of a manipulation of ideas that already existed. It like its already there, but the artist pictures it differently, therefore they manipulate it to there own idea/image of how it should be representated. Together its like a Design Artist. Someone designed (brought forth) an idea and the artist recreated it to thier own eye. They can work together or apart to creat one designed artwork, or make two seperate pieces; A great design or a fine mosiac. Some can balance both, some only one. I can balance both, but i like Designer more...There arent many rules in a Design, but there are rules in Art. For the art to hit your heart, it has to have a balance in shadding, color, sytle, meaning...etc. A design must be clear and understandable without many words. Like logo..U c the Nike logo and the message is clear. This is just my personal opinion. check out my group: GetGo |
|
4239 posts back to top |
| Posted 12 months ago Thoughtfull comments from everyone. I have seen the use of type brought up to an art form in the last 100 years. Russian designs from the 20's influence us still. If viewers are not familiar with important Russian graphic artists of the time do your homework. I would assume since this is coming from a design topic in the bistro people know what I am talking about. Type can be an art form. |
|
2 posts back to top |
| Posted 12 months ago Janice says ...
Added this to my interesting and more involved thoughts of the day!
|
|
5 posts back to top |
| Posted 11 months ago While I agree with a lot of other others that there's a very miniscule (if any) difference. I suppose that anyone who wanted to be strictly a "designer" could argue that design is, in a sense, stricter and while art tends to have the tradition of being open, expressive, and more introspective, design often has an application that demands it fits into certain external situations or appeal to some sort of third party. Granted that "art" can have the same notion to appeal to a third party when the artist (and every artist for that matter) is really looking to sell their work, so to some extent it's got to appeal to anyone who would want to buy art. However, I just think that design almost always fits into some sort of application or problem solving scenario, where as art is broader and even simple sketches and unconcious doodles fit. |
|
4 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago Great topic. The two most important insights I've ever been given were by two seperate college professors. A professor who was teaching Printmaking, and is herself a very good Printmaker, once stated very matter of factly that "Design is not Art, there is art in Design, but its not a Fine Art." I didn't much care for the assesment until a year or two later when one of my Graphic Design professors said something that informed that point of view. While displaying his artwork to a collection of student and faculty he explained that, to him, Fine Art "is a search". I don't think I've ever heard a better explination of what it is to create Art. Design is not Art because the message one starts out with is clear. You have a brief or copy or a task and then its your job as a Designer to meet that task. Often, the completion is itself a search and to me thats where the art comes into it. However Art, or Fine Art if you wish, is its own search for meaning. Thats about as much insight I have on the subject without delving into the laborious contemplation of "What is Art" which is its own tiring discussion. |
|
3 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago Throughout my college career I'd had the same dilemma. I think the two studies can and should co-mingle. You learn things more naturally through making a painting then looking at an illustrator file. I personally get a better understanding of composition when I work with materials like an artist. I like to draw things and then when I'm working with the material something artistic will come out, more than just a thumb nail sketch, it will turn into a drawing. Obviously this was distracting at first but I think you should take as much creative direction with design as you do art. I was always a rebel in class I'd do a flash animation composed of pencil marks. Compare that to some of the fade in and out photos that your classmates got from the stock shop (yawn). Taking hold of your own creative direction always yields distinct results. You gain a sense of originality and style that way and ultimately that's great design. It's not just an arrangement of shapes and colors. It's an understanding of an aesthetic, preferably your own. |
|
74 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago Let me ask this forum a related question. Are those of us in the Graphics Communications arena considered Graphic Artists or Graphic Designers. Because if art is meant to envoke an emotion, don t we as graphic artists/designers do that when we desing a particular print media piece, with certain derived color schemes as well as typesets? Don't all of these combined invoke a desired emotion or convey a meaning? In that sense I would say that Art and Design are synonimous(sp?). Because isn't that what art and design is about is the creative process? The only difference I see is the chosen medium used to create the finished product/artwork. Input on this comment/ observation? I agree this is a very lively topic. |
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago I am an undergrad student of architecture and my thesis is designing a museum of design in India. I ma myself exploring the difference between the two, especially in a country where design and art have always been synonymous. Somebody argued that whether graphic designers are designers or artists. I feel that graphic design is an interface between art and design. A design is always done by man to satisfy the needs of the people and to make lifestyle easy and comfortable. Although the inspiration of design could be from art. In short " art could be a muse for design". Recently a friend of mine, who is a product designer, designed a hai comb for ladies and took her inspiration from kashmiri art. So here design is done to satisfy a particular need of a society, but the look of the product or its "visual appeal" is taken from an art form in India. Looking forward to more arguments on this issue as it is very interesting and requires deep reading on the two subjects: art and design. |
|
3207 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago This is sort of like which came first the chicken or the egg??? Can you have one without the other???? Is it inherent that they are bound together. I always thought so ,and still do ,and this was apparent to me when I went to a Modern Art exhibit , and saw a red panel with a black dot near the top of the canvas. This was the entire painting, and as I stood there I went from wondering why was this created ,and then why did the artist put that dot in that place? It was designed by the artist to get something across to the viewer, but it was art and designed, but I never really understood the underlined feeling., or meaning as it did not even have a title to give me a clue.. |
|
1430 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago JayDub1984 says ...
Remember, before I said the above "art is meant to envoke an emotion," I first said "Good art is designed. Good design is art." I don't think they are quite synonymous BUT they are very close, it's just a hair away from being a discussion of pure semantics :) but that's okay, it has brought forward some thought evoking ideas :) thanks danieldavid! Where's the chicken? I've dropped the egg! Gee I hope the chicken is still around here somewhere... and that it's not a rooster! Each day is a gift, open it up and play with it! |
|
3 posts back to top |
| Posted 8 months ago For me design seems to have a more structured and organized feeling to it than perhaps "art." Art in general is a broad topic because it covers sooo many things. To put a label with what art "is"....is automatically limiting it. So to break down and get to the grind stone of what art and design are....perhaps the biggest differences between the two are how they are used in a sentence. This is what this whole discussion is about. But, otherwise in essence both art and design are creative processes used to create a desired final product but have infinite amounts of potential of where it can be derived from and where it can go. Those that want to argue about the petty differences have WAYYY too much time on their hands and need to get back to the grind stone and work on their art instead of worrying about things such as this. Those that feel that it is important to know such details will have to learn with ambiguity because I don't think ANY one really knows and those that claim they do are inexcuseably ego-centric. That is the mystery of our language and to sit down and try to figure it out is like a dog chasing it's tail. So...in a nutshell. Who the F*** knows....and who cares? Art and design are about the journey of continously working with the creative process to achieve a new magnum opus that is greater than our last. Welcome to the world of art AND design:) |
|
67 posts back to top |
| Posted 8 months ago This is simply my criteria. I think of design as an aethetic application to things functional and fine art as visual aetshetic that is arrived at through the pesonal need to express one's sentiments or response to stimuli. DAN BOOS VISUAL ARTIST |

